Detroit Auto Show: Concept Vehicles

naias_logo_vertB_negfullC_rgb

While some of the production vehicles have stolen the show at the North American International Auto Show, there are a number of concepts that have been introduced. The 2012 Detroit Auto Show had several interesting concepts, and there seem to be fewer this year as the production models are more prevalent. Concepts can have a variety of purposes. Some are previews of future models, such as the Ford Atlas Concept – a preview of the next generation F-150. Others are just odd like the X-Truck. See all the 2013 concepts in the gallery below. As before, links will take you to the full article at Autoblog.

Saab Ownership Transfer Delayed and Spyker Sues GM

The deadline for the transfer of Saab to its new owners, National Electric Vehicle Sweden AB (NEVS), was last week, but the transfer did not take place. SaabsUnited is reporting that NEVS press manager Mikael Östlund has stated that the transfer has been delayed by at least one month. NEVS is confident the transfer will be completed by the end of summer.

Taking over a company that has gone through bankruptcy is complicated, especially a company that sells products worldwide. The transfer will take time. I am hopeful that the Saab name will continue.

Meanwhile, former Saab owner Spyker Cars is suing General Motors (GM) for its part in Saab’s bankruptcy. Autoblog reports that Spyker is suing for $3 billion and claims that GM interfered in Saab’s business practices and forced its bankruptcy. One might wonder how GM could have interfered in a company it owned, but Spyker had purchased Saab from GM. The lawsuit revolves around GM’s mishandling of Spyker’s choice to allow Chinese automaker Zhejiang Youngman Lotus Automobile (Youngman) to invest in Saab. Spyker claims that GM killed the deal, and forced bankruptcy, to avoid competing with Saab in the Chinese market.

Does Spyker have a case? Absolutely. But it the GM – Spyker – Saab relationship is complicated. As SaabsUnited explains, Saab and GM had entered into a Automotive Technology License Agreement with Saab, and that agreement continued after Spyker purchased Saab from GM. Because of this agreement, Saab had access to GM’s platforms and technology, but Saab had a habit of making changes to GM’s platforms in its cars. The concern for GM with Youngman investing in Saab was that they would have access to GM’s technology. However, Youngman would not have had access to Saab’s 9-3, 9-4X, and 9-5 because of the details of the agreement. Instead, Youngman would have loaned money to Spyker allowing for the development of Saab’s Phoenix Platform and the eventual phasing out of GM’s platforms.

Saab’s problems began in early 2011, and Spyker was trying to figure out a solution that would serve its interest and preserve Saab. Spyker’s agreement with Youngman, known as the Framework Agreement, would have allowed Spyker to accept loans from Youngman, but Yougman would not become an equity partner into the company until GM’s platforms were completely phased out. In short, Yougman would have NEVER seen GM’s technology. Sounds like a fair deal, but GM stopped it. This forced Youngman to back out, and Saab was forced to declare bankruptcy in December 2011.

I believe Spyker has a strong case. The Framework Agreement did not involve GM, and even protected them from Youngman. Why did GM object? Clearly they were threatened by a Chinese company that would have certainly brought the next generation of Saab vehicles into China to compete with GM’s offerings. There are certainly two sides to every store, but this appears to be a simple case of a poor sport attempting to defeat the competition before it even had a chance. I have been very vocal about GM’s mishandling of Saab (as I expressed in this post), and I hope Spyker can prove its case. As with the Saab transfer to NEVS, I will continue to follow this story as it develops.

UPDATE: SaabsUnited is reporting that Youngman is also considering legal action against General Motors over their interference in the deal between them on Spyker.

Review: Automotive Websites

In December I posted a review of the Automotive websites. As far as I know, no one has ever ranked these websites based on their content, layout, and ease of use. Auto websites are important because they inform the consumer of the best, and worst, cars on the market. But these sites do not always make it easy for the consumer.

No doubt you have seen them all. Car & Driver, Motor Trend, Top Gear, Consumers Reports, Autoblog, Auto Week, and Road & Track. They review cars and rank them, but no one ranks them. That is about to change.

I follow the auto industry closely and peruse the websites of all the major auto magazines. The rankings listed here are my opinion and do not take into account their print magazines, but only to the accessibility of their websites. The magazines are largely similar as they typically review the same new cars in any give month. The rankings are instead based on how their websites are organized and the accessibility of their content. This is how I rank them:

7. Consumer Reports

I decided to add Consumer Reports to the lineup because it is an important publication. Its car issue is always popular, but its website is a disappointment. I had not tested their website before adding it to this list, so it would be a true test. I assumed it would not give in depth coverage, but I would have access to the rankings and overall scores for the cars. I was wrong. I was surprised when looking up the 2012 Ford Focus that I had to be a subscriber to get their actual rankings and score. That is a shame because all the other websites on this list provide their major reviews in print and online. While this may not be the greatest business strategy, it is great for consumers, something I would have expected from a publication called Consumer Reports.

6. Car & Driver

The only reason Car & Driver is not last is because I added Consumer Reports to the article. Sadly, my original criticisms still ring true: If you are looking for a clean layout, rich with images and easy to navigate, avoid Car & Driver. Their website was much easier to navigate before the recent refresh. The layout is bland and lacks images. Even their image galleries are bland and are not large enough. Readers like to be guided by images, but Car & Driver fails to deliver on that front. It is a shame because they have very good articles, but they are buried in the wordy layout.

5. Auto Week

Still in fifth place is Auto Week. As before, I enjoy looking at the images and the headlines, but I wish there was more content on the home page.  Where Car & Driver is too wordy, Auto Week is not wordy enough. There home page is full of images and links, but it does not feature a great number of articles, just the headlines. For more articles, the reader left with the navigation bar to take you places. Again, Auto Week has good articles, but they are buried within the website.

4. Motor Trend

Still in fourth is Motor Trend. It is probrably the most popular auto magazine and there is good reason for this. Their articles are usually well written and their beginning of the year rankings, “Car of Year,” and “Truck of the Year” segments are always touted by automakers. Their website is not bad. Their headlines scroll across the front page, but it is surrounded by ads. The image above, for example, has three different ads which bury the content on the page. The navigation menu is not the greatest either. Auto Week‘s is better, but you do not get a nice streamlined place to read the news offered by Motor Trend.

3. Top Gear

Perhaps the most surprising change in the ranking is the drop of Top Gear from second to third. This was not an easy decision for me, but I decided to really dig deeper into all the websites this time, and Top Gear begins to disappoint. First, I want to apologize to Lord Stig for saying this, but after really digging through the website, I have have been generous only dropping it to third. The most striking thing to me was the fact the website had not been changed since December. It has the same layout and the cover picture of Richard, James and Jeremy is the same as before (go ahead, check!). But the most annoying part of the website is how they publish their articles. Many of them are spread out across on a series of pages (more than 10) with a few paragraphs of text and ONE photograph per page. It is a real pain. The other reason that I downgraded the site is that many American cars are not covered on the site.

Although it has dropped in the rankings, my previous comments still stand: Top Gear is a great TV show from the United Kingdom (the History Channel’s version SUCKS), and it is a great auto magazine. In the US a subscription to Top Gear costs $90 or you can pay $9.95 at the newsstand. Their magazine would be largely unfamiliar to Americans because it is very different from our auto magazines. While a typical issue of Car & Driver is somewhere around 100 pages, an issue of Top Gear is closer to 300. The articles are more extensive and there are more articles on historic cars as well. Top Gear‘s website is like that as well. You do not only get new car reviews, but commentary on car culture as well. If you have watched Top Gear on the BBC, you know that the hosts are all about fun, but there is a large staff in addition to the three hosts that put together Top Gear, the website and magazine. The only reason the Top Gear is not number one on my ranking is because it focuses on European cars and does not cover a number of cars only available o the American Market. Nevertheless, Top Gear is a great place to read about great cars and learn about cars that we only wish we could get in the US.

2. Road & Track

I really like Road & Track and is has moved up to second in the rankings. The website has a great feature section at the top and an easy to read list of headlines in the section below. They have updated the website nicely and feature full articles and reviews. Although the magazine Road & Track is not the most popular, their website is pretty easy to navigate. You can find most everything you need on the home page. The headlines scroll across the top and there is a listing of the most recent articles below the headlines area. Their articles are well written and enjoyable.

1. Autoblog

Even after six months, I have no new comments to offer on Autoblog. They are still the best!

THE WINNER: I chose Autoblog as the best auto website because it is unlike any other website on this list. They do not publish a magazine and only deliver their news on via the Internet. Autoblog reviews cars, has the latest news, covers car culture, and even incorporates news from the other magazines (such as Motor Trend and Top Gear). This makes the website the best place to gain quick access to the latest automotive news. The website is organized much like a blog, so you can read the posts in the reverse order they were released. It is, therefore, easy to stay caught up with the latest news.

OVERALL

All the websites presented in my rankings produce quality content, this was a way to rate how easy it is for the readers to access this content. While Car & Driver and Motor Trend are the top two magazines, their websites are not as accessible as Autoblog. All the websites in this listing have received minor updates since December with the exception of Top Gear. Although none of the websites are perfect, there is a clear hierarchy. If I could offer a few suggestions to these websites, I would ask them all to create better menus. They all have similar menus, but they could be better. I will admit that choosing ranks 1 – 5 was difficult as they all offer similar content. In fact, I would recommend any of the top five sites to anyone looking to purchase a new car. I could not recommend the websites of Car & Driver and Consumer Reports, however. In print, they are exceptional publications, but on the web, they need work. Overall, the automotive industry has a vibrant media, and I believe that is well represented in this article.

Saab to Sale Cars ‘As-Is’….For Now

I thought it would be interesting to document the death of an auto company. I started with a blog post yesterday about Saab’s bankruptcy. I will continue to follow this story as Saab liquidation continues.

A memo from Saab leaked suggesting that it has suspended all warranty work in North America and all remaining new Saabs will be sold as-is. Although this is not official, it is likely to be announced soon. This is almost certainly the beginning of what will come as a result of the Saab bankruptcy. Saab has had a long history and to see such a storied company come to a tragic end is depressing because it show volatile the auto industry is today.

Read the full memo:

UPDATE: 12/21: Saab Cars USA CEO Tim Colbeck has said he hopes to find a solution. In a statement he said:

“We’re committed to develop a way to handle warranties for all owners of 2010 and 2011 Saab models. [The goal is to] reinstate (warranty coverage) as quickly as we can.”

Meanwhile, General Motors said it will honor all warranties for Saab models produced before January 1, 2010. That leaves out owners of the majority of 2010, and all of 2011 model year Saab models.

Source: Autoblog

Review: Automotive News Sites

You’ve seen them all. Car & Driver, Motor Trend, Top Gear, Autoblog, Auto Week, and Road & Track. They review cars and rank them, but no one ranks them. That is about to change.

I follow the auto industry closely and peruse the websites of all the major auto magazines. The rankings listed here are my opinion and do not take into account their print magazines, but only to the accessibility of their websites. The magazines are largely similar as they typically review the same new cars in any give month. The rankings are instead based on how their websites are organized and the accessibility of their content. This is how I rank them:

6. Car & Driver

If you are looking for a clean layout, rich with images and easy to navigate, avoid Car & Driver. Their website was much easier to navigate before the recent refresh. The layout is bland and extremely wordy. Readers like to be guided by images, but Car & Driver fails to deliver on that front. It is a shame because they have very good articles, but they are buried in the wordy layout.

5. Auto Week

Where Car & Driver is too wordy, Auto Week is not wordy enough. There home page is full of images and links, but it does not feature a great number of articles, just the headlines. For more articles, you have left with the navigation bar to take you places. Again, Auto Week has really good articles, but they are buried within the website.

4. Motor Trend

Motor Trend is probrably the most popular auto magazine and there is good reason for this. Their articles are usually well written and their beginning of the year rankings and “Car of Year” and “Truck of the Year” segments are always touted by automakers. Their website is not bad. Their headlines scroll across the front page, but it is surrounded by ads. The image above, for example, has four different ads which bury the content on the page. The navigation menu is not the greatest either. Auto Week‘s is better, but you do not get a nice streamlined place to read the news.

3. Road & Track

Although the magazine Road & Track is not the most popular, but their website is pretty easy to navigate. You can find most everything you need on the home page. The headlines scroll across the top and there is a listing of the most recent articles below the headlines area. While this is helpful, it is just a list of titles of articles. Like the others, their articles are well written, but there should be a better way to feature articles.

2. Top Gear

Top Gear is not just a great TV show from the United Kingdom (the History Channel’s version SUCKS), but it is also a great auto magazine. In the US a subscription to Top Gear costs $90 or you can pay $9.95 at the newsstand. Their magazine would be largely unfamiliar to Americans because it is very different from our auto magazines. While a typical issue of Car & Driver is somewhere around 100 pages, an issue of Top Gear is closer to 300. The articles are more extensive and there are more articles on historic cars as well. Top Gear‘s website is like that as well. You do not only get new car reviews, but commentary on car culture as well. If you have watched Top Gear on the BBC, you know that the hosts are all about fun, but there is a large staff in addition to the three hosts that put together Top Gear, the website and magazine. The only reason the Top Gear is not number one on my ranking is because it focuses on European cars and does not cover a number of cars only available o the American Market. Nevertheless, Top Gear is a great place to read about great cars and learn about cars that we only wish we could get in the US.

1. Autoblog

THE WINNER: Autoblog. I chose Autoblog as the best auto website because it is unlike any other website on this list. They do not publish a magazine and only deliver their news on via the Internet. Autoblog reviews cars, has the latest news, covers car culture, and even incorporates news from the other magazines (such as Motor Trend and Top Gear). This makes the website the best place to gain quick access to the latest automotive news. The website is organized much like a blog, so you can read the posts in the reverse order they were released. It is, therefore, easy to stay caught up with the latest news.

OVERALL

All the website presented here produce quality content, as I would not have included a website that did not. While Car & Driver and Motor Trend are the top two magazines, their websites are not as accessible as Autoblog. This ranking, after all, was about the quickest way to access the latest car information online. And for that, Autoblog easily wins.